Striking a Balance: Choosing Between Automation and Manual Testing for Mobile Apps

Introduction

In the realm of mobile app testing, the question of whether to automate or rely on manual testing often arises. It's essential to approach this decision with careful consideration to ensure the best outcomes for your mobile application. This article aims to explore the factors that can guide you in making an informed choice.

Benefits of Mobile Automation Testing

Time and Effort:

Manual testing can be time-consuming and mentally exhausting, particularly when dealing with extensive test scenarios or large datasets. Automation offers the ability to execute tests faster and more efficiently.

Simplified Test Flow:

Certain test tasks can be broken down into logical steps with predefined expected outcomes. Automation provides a way to simplify and streamline these processes.

Cost Efficiency:

Automated testing can be more cost-effective, especially when repetitive tests need to be conducted regularly. It reduces the need for extensive manual effort, thus saving resources in the long run.

Scalability:

Mobile automation testing allows you to test the speed and performance of your app under various conditions, including thousands of concurrent users. This scalability is hard to achieve with manual testing alone.

Regression Testing:

Automation enables the rapid execution of multiple tests simultaneously, making it ideal for regression testing after code changes.

Cases for Manual Testing

One-time or Infrequent Tests:

In scenarios where tests need to be run only once or twice, manual testing may be quicker and more cost effective than investing in automation infrastructure.

Complex Use-Cases:

Complicated scenarios that require human intuition, adaptability, and real-time decision-making may be better suited for manual testing.

User Experience Evaluation:

To accurately replicate the experience of real users, manual testing remains essential. It allows testers to assess usability and user-friendliness comprehensively.

Usability Testing:

Some aspects of usability testing cannot be effectively automated, making manual testing indispensable for evaluating the user-friendliness of mobile apps.

Ad Hoc Testing:

When detailed planning or documentation is lacking, manual testing offers the flexibility and improvisation necessary to explore the application's behavior thoroughly.

Conclusion:

Choosing between automation and manual testing for mobile apps is a strategic decision that should consider various factors. While automation provides efficiency and scalability, manual testing remains invaluable in certain scenarios. By striking a balance between the two approaches, you can ensure comprehensive testing and deliver a high-quality mobile application.

Recommendation: WeTest Live Testing

WeTest Live Testing allows testers to see how the app will behave when a real user uses it and assures that the app works correctly to ensure a smooth experience for all users.

WeTest Live Testing Features

1. Maximum real device market coverage

You could test on thousands of Android and iOS real devices including iPhone, Huawei, Xiaomi, Samsung Galaxy, Oppo, Vivo, and Pixel with different screens and OS versions.

2. Test Dev and Published Apps

WeTest Live Testing allows you to upload and test on your dev APK/AAB/IPA files. It is also allowed to install production apps from Play Store/App Store.

3. Real-time Debugging

You could debug your app instantly, view device logs, inspect UI elements, and use stack trace to find and fix bugs easily.

4. ADB Command Debugging

It has easy access to Android cloud devices directly from adb shell which could help you ship quality apps even faster.

Try WeTest Live Testing now!